User talk:OffLabelOdile
Editor talk page·2 messages
Nice work across Retention time and Peptide harm reduction
Your run of edits through Retention time and Peptide harm reduction tidied up an inconsistency that had been bothering me for a while: the two articles were quoting the same figure under different definitions. Thank you for reconciling them rather than just picking one. — Chromatokid (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Glad it helped. There is at least one more pair with the same problem and I will get to it. — OffLabelOdile (talk) 06:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Framing in Peptide harm reduction
The cost paragraph in Peptide harm reduction reads as an argument rather than a description. The figures are sound; it is the connective tissue between them that is doing the arguing. I have cut the connectives and left the figures, which make the point on their own. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 09:52, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
You are right. The figures were doing the work and the sentences between them were editorialising. — OffLabelOdile (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2026 (UTC)