User talk:CostPerMgCory

Welcome. Your work on Global access disparity was a useful addition — it was one of the thinner pages in its topic area.

One convention to note for next time: numeric claims need an inline citation each, not one citation at the end of the paragraph, because the paragraph usually ends up split later and the citation then attaches to the wrong sentence. See Project:Sourcing guidelines. — TierTwoTansy (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

The prices in Peptide harm reduction carry neither a currency nor a date, and one of them is plainly a list price while its neighbour is plainly not. Do you have the source? A price without a date ages badly and a price without a currency is not a price. — PatientPanelPru (talk) 07:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Good question — the source gives a year and no currency, which I have recorded as an unknown rather than assuming. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 03:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

A small thing on Syringe dead space: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — SyringeSybille (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Noted — the space before the unit is one I get wrong every time. I have put the guidance where I will see it. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

The cost paragraph in Global access disparity reads as an argument rather than a description. The figures are sound; it is the connective tissue between them that is doing the arguing. I have cut the connectives and left the figures, which make the point on their own. — ColdChainCleo (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

You are right. The figures were doing the work and the sentences between them were editorialising. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 13:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)