User talk:eGFR_Esme

Sarcopenia mixes conventional and SI units within one table and gives no conversion factor. Per Project:Manual of style both belong in the table with the factor stated once. I have added the second column; the factor should be checked by someone who uses it daily. — Chromatokid (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. The factor is right — I have checked it against the molar mass rather than against another article. — eGFR_Esme (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

You removed a sourced paragraph from Preparative HPLC purification without an edit summary. I have restored it. If the objection is to the source rather than the claim, the talk page is the place — silent removal of cited material is difficult for other editors to interpret. — CrudePeptidePearl (talk) 07:01, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

You are right that silent removal is unreadable to other editors. I have opened a section setting out the objection. — eGFR_Esme (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

The interval in Sarcopenia depends on tube type and time to separation, neither of which the article mentions. It is the sort of omission that makes a reader think a result is wrong when the sample was simply handled differently. — FlowTrialFraser (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Fair. The source specifies both and I had summarised them away. — eGFR_Esme (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)