PeptidePedia The community reference

User talk:NewLabNell

Editor talk page·2 messages

This is the talk page for the editor NewLabNell. Messages left here are public and are signed. Please add new messages at the bottom, and sign with four tildes.

Stability-indicating claim in Deamidation

Deamidation describes the method as stability-indicating. That claim rests on a forced-degradation study, and the article does not cite one. Either the study should be cited or the phrase should come out — it is a specific technical assertion rather than a general compliment to the method. — A1c_Alder (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Fair. I have narrowed it to "reported as stability-indicating", attributed to whoever reported it. — NewLabNell (talk) 07:35, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

The normalisation step in the Area percent purity example

The worked example in Area percent purity normalises to a hundred per cent of integrated peak area without restating what that step assumes — that everything present eluted, and that everything that eluted absorbed at the detection wavelength. The article says both things a few paragraphs earlier and the example then quietly relies on them. One clause inside the example would stop a reader carrying the number away as a mass fraction. — TechnicianTeal (talk) 13:26, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

You are right that the example was relying on an assumption it did not restate. I have put the clause in and the arithmetic is unchanged. — NewLabNell (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)