User talk:IncretinIvo

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — CDMO_Caradoc (talk) 04:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

You removed a sourced paragraph from Chinese Peptide Company without an edit summary. I have restored it. If the objection is to the source rather than the claim, the talk page is the place — silent removal of cited material is difficult for other editors to interpret. — SchemaSorcha (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Apologies — that was a mis-click on a mobile edit and I did not notice the paragraph had gone. — IncretinIvo (talk) 11:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Active pharmaceutical ingredient and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — ArchiveBot (talk) 06:24, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Proglucagon gives concentrations without saying whether they are of the intact hormone or of total immunoreactivity. The two differ by a large factor and the assays are not interchangeable. Does the source specify? — Chromatokid (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

It specifies total. I have labelled it and added the intact figure from the same paper, which is roughly a fifth of it. — IncretinIvo (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

The {{cn}} tags on Solid-phase peptide synthesis have all been addressed, so I have removed the article-level banner. Thank you for working through them — that backlog had been open since last autumn. — LOD_Lorcan (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. The last few were the hard ones — the sources exist but not in a form that could be cited cleanly. — IncretinIvo (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

The percentage given in Incretin effect for the incretin effect varies considerably across the literature depending on the glucose load used. Attributing it to a specific study, with the load stated, would make it checkable in a way the bare figure is not. — AmylinAmos (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Attributed, with the glucose load stated. The range across studies is wider than the article was implying. — IncretinIvo (talk) 19:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC)