User talk:EndotoxinEd

The reception figure in Shenzhen Hybio Pharmaceutical is labelled as self-reported at the top of the section and then used three more times without the label. Per Project:Sourcing guidelines the labelling attaches at each point of use, because paragraphs get split and reordered. I have added it at the other three. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 22:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. The labelling at each point of use is repetitive and it is also the only thing that survives a paragraph being split. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 01:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

I have removed the aggregate pass-rate figure from Underfilling. The denominator is not knowable from purchaser submissions, so the percentage was arithmetic performed on a number that does not exist. Everything else in the section stands. — ColdChainCleo (talk) 05:49, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

No argument — the denominator does not exist and the percentage was arithmetic on nothing. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 02:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Blind sampling refers to a testing service's competence without saying whether it holds accreditation to a recognised standard. Either the accreditation should be cited or the article should say plainly that it is not stated — self-description is not evidence of either. — Chromatokid (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

It is not stated anywhere I can find, and the article now says that in as many words. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 01:38, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Chinese Peptide Company reports agreement between certificates and independent reports. Since none of those samples was drawn blind, the agreement establishes that two measurements of one vial agreed and nothing about the lot. Would you object to the section saying that in those terms? — PeakShapePol (talk) 20:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

No objection at all — that is more precise than what is there, and I have rewritten the sentence in those terms. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

The reception figure in GenScript Peptides is labelled as self-reported at the top of the section and then used three more times without the label. Per Project:Sourcing guidelines the labelling attaches at each point of use, because paragraphs get split and reordered. I have added it at the other three. — UnderfillUna (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. I have added it at the other two uses in the infobox as well, which you would not have seen from the body. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

A merge of Peptide into Underfilling has been proposed. My own view is that they are separate subjects with separate failure modes and should stay separate, but I am not confident enough to close it. Comments welcome at the article talk page. — SurvodutideSaff (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

I have commented, opposing. The two subjects share vocabulary and nothing else, and the merged article would have two unrelated halves. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 10:07, 29 September 2025 (UTC)