User talk:WeaselWordWim
Editor talk page·2 messages
Consistency across Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) and Repackaging
Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) and Repackaging now use the same units, the same date format and the same abbreviations at first use, which they did not a fortnight ago. That kind of work is invisible unless somebody reads the two articles together, which is exactly what readers here do. — AnaesthesiaAoife (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you. Reading them side by side is what made the inconsistencies visible in the first place. — WeaselWordWim (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Wording in Thermo Fisher Scientific (China)
I have reworded one sentence in Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — BaselineBex (talk) 19:37, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Point taken. A number where one exists is a rule I should have absorbed by now. — WeaselWordWim (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2026 (UTC)