User talk:SecretagogueSol

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — ThymosinTamsin (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

The sentence added to Exenatide takes a tissue-repair result in one animal model and states it as a general property. Project:No original research is aimed at exactly this step. Describing the model, the endpoint and the absence of human data is both permitted and more useful. — OrforglipronOona (talk) 02:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. The descriptive version turned out to be more interesting than the claim I was making. — SecretagogueSol (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

One of the references in Exenatide is a discussion-board post. Per Project:Verifiability that cannot support a factual claim here regardless of how well-informed it is. I have tagged the sentence rather than removing it, in case a publication says the same thing. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. I have found a publication that says the same thing and swapped the reference. — SecretagogueSol (talk) 08:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your run of edits through Growth hormone secretagogue and Semaglutide tidied up an inconsistency that had been bothering me for a while: the two articles were quoting the same figure under different definitions. Thank you for reconciling them rather than just picking one. — UnderfillUna (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I would rather have the criticism when it comes, so do not spare it. — SecretagogueSol (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2026 (UTC)