User talk:NavboxNiko

List of GLP-1 receptor agonists is a list without a stated inclusion criterion, so there is no principled way to say whether an entry belongs. A sentence in the lead saying what qualifies — and what does not — would settle the three additions currently being argued about. — ColdChainCleo (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

You are right that there was no principled way to argue about it. There is now. — NavboxNiko (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for going through List of GLP-1 receptor agonists and giving every term a definition rather than a link. A glossary that links to articles the reader then has to read is not a glossary, and this one now works as one. — RetinopathyRex (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Appreciated. Several of the definitions came out of talk-page arguments, which is the best source for a glossary. — NavboxNiko (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

List of GLP-1 receptor agonists is a list without a stated inclusion criterion, so there is no principled way to say whether an entry belongs. A sentence in the lead saying what qualifies — and what does not — would settle the three additions currently being argued about. — SeeAlsoSelma (talk) 03:20, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Fair. I have written the criterion and reconciled the existing entries against it. — NavboxNiko (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2026 (UTC)