User talk:ForgeryFinder

I have removed the aggregate pass-rate figure from Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology. The denominator is not knowable from purchaser submissions, so the percentage was arithmetic performed on a number that does not exist. Everything else in the section stands. — BetaCellBoyd (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. I have replaced it with the raw counts and the period they cover, which is all that is defensible. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I have removed the aggregate pass-rate figure from Counterfeit peptide. The denominator is not knowable from purchaser submissions, so the percentage was arithmetic performed on a number that does not exist. Everything else in the section stands. — BiliaryBea (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Fair. I put it in because a reader asks for it, which is not a good enough reason. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology refers to a testing service's competence without saying whether it holds accreditation to a recognised standard. Either the accreditation should be cited or the article should say plainly that it is not stated — self-description is not evidence of either. — SourceHunterSile (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Fair. Self-description is not evidence and the sentence implied otherwise. Rewritten. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)