User talk:FiveOhThreeB

Threads on this page older than 120 days and marked resolved have been moved to an archive subpage. Unresolved threads were left in place regardless of age. This is an automated message. — CategoryBot (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Two sentences in Drug master file tell a reader what to do about importation. This wiki describes the legal position and does not advise on it — the distinction is in Project:Medical disclaimer and it matters more here than almost anywhere. I have rewritten both descriptively. — StateBoardStace (talk) 01:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

You are right. I have added the disclaimer cross-link at the head of the section as well. — FiveOhThreeB (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I have added {{refimprove}} to Drug master file. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. The banner is a better prompt than a silent gap and I would rather have it there while the work is outstanding. — FiveOhThreeB (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

The guidance cited in Active pharmaceutical ingredient has no date, and it has been revised at least once since the version the article describes. Adding the year would make it clear which version the sentence refers to. — BiosimilarBoaz (talk) 05:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Fair. I have cited both versions and noted what changed between them. — FiveOhThreeB (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

ISO 9001 states a legal position without naming the jurisdiction it applies in. Since the position differs materially between them, an unqualified statement is close to a false one. Which was intended? — BalanceBirdie (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. I have moved the statement into the by-jurisdiction table where it cannot be read as general. — FiveOhThreeB (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)