PeptidePedia The community reference

Temperature excursion: difference between revisions

Diff·revision 11 → 12·13:47, 18 Jul 2025

Difference between revision 11 and revision 12 of Temperature excursion. 16 lines changed; the page grew by 574 bytes.

Revision 11 — 11:28, 8 Jul 2025
RepackRadek (talk)
add the collapse-temperature point, sourced
11,765 bytes +812
Revision 12 — 13:47, 18 Jul 2025
MicrodoseMagnus (talk)
close an unbalanced quotation mark
12,339 bytes +574
13| Rate multiplier per 10 K near 25 °C = approximately 313| Rate multiplier per 10 K near 25 °C = approximately 3
14| Applicable to freezing damage = No14| Applicable to freezing damage = No
+15<!-- Assessment inputs -->
+16| Primary evidence = ICH Q1A(R2) stability data for the product
+17| Confirmatory testing = Stability-indicating assay
+18| Cumulative accounting = Time out of refrigeration, summed across events
+19| Governing chapters = USP <659>, USP <1079>
15}}20}}
16{{hatnote|For the system an excursion represents a failure of, see [[Cold chain]]. For dating of opened and compounded preparations, see [[Beyond-use date]].}}21{{hatnote|For the system an excursion represents a failure of, see [[Cold chain]]. For dating of opened and compounded preparations, see [[Beyond-use date]].}}
57The corresponding position for lyophilised research peptides is that no such allowance exists in a documented form. Supplier storage statements are recommendations, and the periods sometimes quoted for ambient tolerance are not supported by an identifiable stability study. The physical argument for the robustness of a dry cake is set out at [[Lyophilisation]] and is a reason to expect tolerance, not a substitute for having measured it.{{r|ppexcursion}}62The corresponding position for lyophilised research peptides is that no such allowance exists in a documented form. Supplier storage statements are recommendations, and the periods sometimes quoted for ambient tolerance are not supported by an identifiable stability study. The physical argument for the robustness of a dry cake is set out at [[Lyophilisation]] and is a reason to expect tolerance, not a substitute for having measured it.{{r|ppexcursion}}
5863
+64{{seealso|Cold chain|Peptide stability table}}
+65
59== Quantifying an excursion ==66== Quantifying an excursion ==
60Where an excursion consists of warming, its cumulative effect is summarised by the mean kinetic temperature. For intervals of duration ''t''<sub>i</sub> at absolute temperatures ''T''<sub>i</sub>:67Where an excursion consists of warming, its cumulative effect is summarised by the mean kinetic temperature. For intervals of duration ''t''<sub>i</sub> at absolute temperatures ''T''<sub>i</sub>:
70{{math|(96 × 22 + 624 × 5) ÷ 720 = (2112 + 3120) ÷ 720 = 7.27 °C}}77{{math|(96 × 22 + 624 × 5) ÷ 720 = (2112 + 3120) ÷ 720 = 7.27 °C}}
7178
+79which lies inside the labelled range. The mean kinetic temperature, however, weights by degradation. With T = 295.15 K and 278.15 K:
+80
72== References ==81== References ==
73{{reflist}}82{{reflist}}
87<ref name="pi_victoza">Novo Nordisk. ''Victoza (liraglutide) injection'' — United States prescribing information, current revision, section on storage and handling.</ref>96<ref name="pi_victoza">Novo Nordisk. ''Victoza (liraglutide) injection'' — United States prescribing information, current revision, section on storage and handling.</ref>
88<ref name="ppexcursion">PeptidePedia community transit-and-storage report tally, 2026 (self-reported, exposure unmeasured, no matched pre-exposure results; weak evidence — see [[Project:Sourcing_guidelines]]).</ref>97<ref name="ppexcursion">PeptidePedia community transit-and-storage report tally, 2026 (self-reported, exposure unmeasured, no matched pre-exposure results; weak evidence — see [[Project:Sourcing_guidelines]]).</ref>
+98
+99== See also ==
+100* [[Cold chain]]
+101* [[Peptide stability table]]
+102* [[Beyond-use date]]
+103* [[Deamidation]]
+104* [[Methionine oxidation]]
89105
90{{DEFAULTSORT:Temperature excursion}}106{{DEFAULTSORT:Temperature excursion}}