Talk:Chinese Peptide Company / Archive 1
Archived discussion·1 closed thread
The water-figure observation — are we praising a supplier?Resolved
Two sections now note that this organisation's certificates include a water figure and that this is uncommon. Read together they function as a compliment, which is not what an organisation article is for. — PuffRemoverPax (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
It is a compliment in effect, but it is also the single most informative documentary fact available about any of these organisations, because without water and counterion figures a purity number cannot be converted into a mass. Suppressing it to preserve an appearance of evenness would be the distortion. — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
That is the right answer and it generalises. I have added the point to the working-group priority list: the documentation-practice sentence should be present and comparable on all twenty supplier articles, whatever it says. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Symmetry addresses my objection entirely. ✓ Resolved — PuffRemoverPax (talk) 11:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)